FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K1100M
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K1100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Quadro K1100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 120 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K1100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Quadro K1100M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Quadro K1100M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | GK107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 705 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 22.59 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |