GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro K1100M
When comparing GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M6 8Q
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro K1100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 122% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 17 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 2212 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 520% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 350% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro K1100M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 22.59 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |