GRID M60 2Q vs Quadro K1100M
When choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Quadro K1100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M60 2Q and Quadro K1100M.
GRID M60 2Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Quadro K1100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 2Q and Quadro K1100M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1100M is 148 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q and Quadro K1100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 2212 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
GRID M60 2Q and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 812% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Quadro K1100M. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Quadro K1100M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | GK107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 705 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 22.59 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |