GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K1100M
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K1100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K1100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1100M is 148 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K1100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 2212 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 287% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 104% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 580% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 344% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K1100M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 22.59 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |