Quadro K1100M vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between Quadro K1100M and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1100M will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla T4
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K1100M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 55% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- Quadro K1100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1100M is 120 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Quadro K1100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 7200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| Quadro K1100M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 14−16 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 812% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K1100M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | GK107 | TU104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |