NVS 810 vs Quadro K1200

When choosing between NVS 810 and Quadro K1200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 810 and Quadro K1200.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro K1200 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K1200
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	45 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 has 51% more power consumption, than Quadro K1200.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K1200 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 and Quadro K1200 are build with Maxwell architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1200 is 156 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 and Quadro K1200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 38 mm longer, than Quadro K1200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K1200 is 3200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	1−2	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K1200.
low / 768p	120−130	200−210
medium / 768p	95−100	170−180
ultra / 1080p	40−45	95−100
QHD / 1440p	21−24	50−55
4K / 2160p	16−18	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	45−50	90−95
ultra / 1080p	21−24	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	10−12	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Fortnite is 162% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	4−5	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Minecraft is 28% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	50−55
medium / 768p	8−9	30−35
high / 1080p	4−5	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−35
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1200 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro K1200
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM107	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	28 January 2015
Pipelines	512	512
Core clock speed	902 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	35.97
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	1,151 gflops
Length	198 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	5.0	5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		132 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro K1200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares