GeForce MX230 vs Quadro K2000

In this comparison between GeForce MX230 and Quadro K2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce MX230 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce MX230 Check Price

Quadro K2000 Check Price

GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:

GeForce MX230 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce MX230	Quadro K2000
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000 has 410% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
GeForce MX230 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce MX230 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000.
GeForce MX230 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000 - in Desktops.
GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro K2000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 565 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.
GeForce MX230 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	9−10	7−8
ultra / 1080p	5−6	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	24−27
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce MX230 and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	160−170	140−150
medium / 768p	130−140	110−120
ultra / 1080p	65−70	55−60
QHD / 1440p	35−40	30−35
4K / 2160p	27−30	27−30
high / 768p	100−110	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	90−95	80−85
medium / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	10−12	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
4K / 2160p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	20−22
medium / 1080p	12−14	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	30−35	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Fortnite is 21% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
QHD / 1440p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
medium / 768p	55−60	45−50
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	6−7	5−6
ultra / 1080p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	12−14
medium / 1080p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	90−95	80−85
medium / 1080p	95−100	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	35−40	27−30
medium / 768p	21−24	18−20
high / 1080p	12−14	10−11
ultra / 1080p	8−9	6−7
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	20−22
high / 768p	40−45	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX230 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K2000.

Full Specs

	GeForce MX230	Quadro K2000
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	N17S-G0	GK107
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	20 February 2019	1 March 2013
Pipelines	256	384
Core clock speed	1519 MHz	954 MHz
Boost Clock	1531 MHz
Transistor count	1,800 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	25.31	30.53
Floating-point performance		732.7 gflops
Length		202 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48.06 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		24 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce MX230 vs Quadro K2000

GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares