GRID K140Q vs Quadro K2000

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K140Q and Quadro K2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K140Q stacks up against Quadro K2000, check out specs charts below.

GRID K140Q

Quadro K2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K140Q	Quadro K2000
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K140Q has 154% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000.
GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2000 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K140Q and Quadro K2000 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 104 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
GRID K140Q and Quadro K2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 2218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	9−10	16−18
medium / 1080p	1−2	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	24−27
medium / 1080p	2−3	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	100−110	140−150
medium / 768p	75−80	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−33	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	9−10	27−30
high / 768p	50−55	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	65−70	80−85
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	6−7	20−22
medium / 1080p	1−2	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Fortnite is 100% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	35−40	55−60
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GRID K140Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 37% more, than GRID K140Q.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1200% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	3−4	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	1−2	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 850% more, than GRID K140Q.
low / 768p	65−70	85−90
medium / 768p	30−35	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−11	20−22
high / 768p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GRID K140Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K140Q	Quadro K2000
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	1 March 2013
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	850 MHz	954 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	30.53
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length		202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		24 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K140Q vs Quadro K2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares