Quadro K2000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
In this comparison between Quadro K2000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GH will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GH has 96% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000.
Quadro K2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GH has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000.
Quadro K2000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
Quadro K2000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 109 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.
Quadro K2000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 2400 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
12−14
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
140−150
250−260
medium / 768p
110−120
220−230
ultra / 1080p
55−60
180−190
QHD / 1440p
30−35
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
85−90
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
8−9
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
20−22
80−85
medium / 1080p
9−10
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 370% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
60−65
180−190
medium / 1080p
24−27
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 264% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
45−50
120−130
high / 1080p
12−14
70−75
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
95−100
130−140
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
27−30
130−140
medium / 768p
18−20
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
6−7
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K2000.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
GK107
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 March 2013
7 January 2018
Pipelines
384
1536
Core clock speed
954 MHz
1063 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
114.2
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
3,656 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
204.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
