FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K2000D

In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9000

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 has 586% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000D - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 54 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2000D are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S9000 is 65 mm longer, than Quadro K2000D.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1500 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	7−8
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	18−20
medium / 1080p	40−45	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	55−60	12−14
ultra / 1080p	45−50	10−12
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	27−30
medium / 1080p	60−65	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	250−260	140−150
medium / 768p	220−230	110−120
ultra / 1080p	180−190	55−60
QHD / 1440p	110−120	30−35
4K / 2160p	70−75	27−30
high / 768p	210−220	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
medium / 768p	110−120	60−65
ultra / 1080p	100−110	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	45−50	9−10
ultra / 1080p	40−45	8−9
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	4−5
low / 720p	80−85	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	60−65	16−18
ultra / 1080p	45−50	10−12
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	65−70
medium / 1080p	110−120	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 240% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	45−50	12−14
QHD / 1440p	30−35	2−3
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	27−30
medium / 1080p	65−70	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	140−150	55−60
medium / 768p	120−130	50−55
high / 1080p	70−75	14−16
ultra / 1080p	30−35	7−8
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	20−22	3−4
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	14−16
medium / 1080p	30−35	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	130−140	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	120−130	95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	8−9
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	14−16
medium / 1080p	35−40	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	130−140	27−30
medium / 768p	85−90	18−20
high / 1080p	45−50	10−11
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
4K / 2160p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
high / 768p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K2000D.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro K2000D
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	1 March 2013
Pipelines	1792	384
Core clock speed	900 MHz	954 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	30.53
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length	267 mm	202 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s	31 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares