FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2000D

In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FireStream 9270

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

FireStream 9270 has 213% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FireStream 9270 and Quadro K2000D have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K2000D - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 204 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000D - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	7−8
ultra / 1080p	2−3	4−5
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	7−8	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	130−140	140−150
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	50−55	55−60
QHD / 1440p	27−30	30−35
4K / 2160p	12−14	27−30
high / 768p	75−80	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 8% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	9−10
ultra / 1080p	5−6	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	21−24
medium / 1080p	8−9	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	16−18
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 28% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	10−12	14−16
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	5−6
ultra / 1080p	1−2	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	14−16
medium / 1080p	5−6	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	80−85	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9270.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	14−16
medium / 1080p	9−10	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	27−30
medium / 768p	14−16	18−20
high / 1080p	6−7	10−11
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
4K / 2160p	3−4	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K2000D
Architecture	TeraScale	Kepler
Code name	RV770	GK107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	1 March 2013
Pipelines	800	384
Core clock speed	750 MHz	954 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	30.53
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length		202 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		31 Mh/s
		Check Price

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares