GeForce 825M vs Quadro K2000D
In this comparison between GeForce 825M and Quadro K2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 825M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M
Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
51 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000D has 54% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce 825M and Quadro K2000D have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000D - in Desktops.
GeForce 825M and Quadro K2000D are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 104 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
GeForce 825M and Quadro K2000D are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
2−3
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 850% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
140−150
medium / 768p
30−33
110−120
ultra / 1080p
6−7
55−60
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
18−20
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 825M.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 108% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
high / 1080p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
75−80
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce 825M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 180% more, than GeForce 825M.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
0−1
27−30
medium / 768p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce 825M.
Full Specs
GeForce 825M
Quadro K2000D
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK208
GK107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
27 January 2014
1 March 2013
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
850 MHz
954 MHz
Boost Clock
941 MHz
Transistor count
915 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
30.11
30.53
Floating-point performance
722.7 gflops
732.7 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price