GeForce GTX 260 vs Quadro K2000D

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro K2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 260 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 260 Check Price

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 260	Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	182 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x S-Video	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 260 has 256% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 260 has 894 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000D - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 288 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000D - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2000D is 192 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 260.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 3001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	7−8
ultra / 1080p	1−2	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	5−6	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	27−30
medium / 1080p	8−9	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	120−130	140−150
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	45−50	55−60
QHD / 1440p	24−27	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	70−75	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	4−5	9−10
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	21−24
medium / 1080p	5−6	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	4−5	−
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	45−50	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	9−10	14−16
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	2−3	5−6
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	14−16
medium / 1080p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	65−70	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	18−20	27−30
medium / 768p	12−14	18−20
high / 1080p	6−7	10−11
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 260.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 260	Quadro K2000D
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GT200	GK107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	1 March 2013
Pipelines	192	384
Core clock speed	1242 MHz	954 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	36.9 billion/sec	30.53
Floating-point performance	476.9 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	202 mm
Memory bus width	448 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	111.9 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
CUDA cores	192
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	30 Mh/s	31 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 260 vs Quadro K2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares