GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K2000D

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K2000D, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 465 stacks up against Quadro K2000D, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 465 Check Price

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pins	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 has 292% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K2000D has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K2000D - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 261 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000D - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2000D is 193 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 2397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−33	18−20
medium / 1080p	18−20	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−12
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	140−150
medium / 768p	170−180	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	55−60
QHD / 1440p	50−55	30−35
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	130−140	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	90−95	60−65
ultra / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	9−10
ultra / 1080p	14−16	8−9
4K / 2160p	6−7	4−5
low / 720p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	18−20	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	10−12
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	65−70
medium / 1080p	50−55	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 60% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
QHD / 1440p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	50−55	27−30
medium / 1080p	27−30	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	80−85	55−60
medium / 768p	70−75	50−55
high / 1080p	27−30	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	7−8
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	9−10	5−6
ultra / 1080p	7−8	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	12−14	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	110−120	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	14−16
medium / 1080p	16−18	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	50−55	27−30
medium / 768p	30−35	18−20
high / 1080p	18−20	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	30−35	21−24
high / 768p	50−55	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro K2000D.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 465	Quadro K2000D
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Code name	GF100	GK107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 May 2010	1 March 2013
Pipelines	352	384
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	954 MHz
Transistor count	3,100 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.7 billion/sec	30.53
Floating-point performance	855.4 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length	9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)	202 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1603 MHz (3206 data rate)	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.6 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
CUDA cores	352
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	64 Mh/s	31 Mh/s
Compute performance	30x
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares