GRID K260Q vs Quadro K2000D
In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
GRID K260Q
Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
51 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K260Q has 341% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000D have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000D are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000D are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
27−30
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
140−150
medium / 768p
180−190
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
55−60
QHD / 1440p
50−55
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
140−150
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
medium / 768p
90−95
60−65
ultra / 1080p
60−65
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
10−12
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
65−70
medium / 1080p
50−55
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
QHD / 1440p
9−10
2−3
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
27−30
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
85−90
55−60
medium / 768p
75−80
50−55
high / 1080p
30−33
14−16
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
9−10
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
27−30
medium / 768p
30−35
18−20
high / 1080p
18−20
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−12
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
high / 768p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Quadro K2000D.
Full Specs
GRID K260Q
Quadro K2000D
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
GK107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
1 March 2013
Pipelines
1536
384
Core clock speed
745 MHz
954 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
30.53
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
732.7 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
64 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Check Price
