NVS 810 vs Quadro K2000D
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing NVS 810 and Quadro K2000D. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between NVS 810 and Quadro K2000D. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Main Specs
NVS 810
Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)
68 Watt
51 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
8x mini-DisplayPort
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
NVS 810 has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
NVS 810 and Quadro K2000D have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K2000D - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 52 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 and Quadro K2000D are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2000D is 4 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 2200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
7−8
ultra / 1080p
1−2
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
4−5
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro K2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
140−150
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
55−60
QHD / 1440p
21−24
30−35
4K / 2160p
16−18
27−30
high / 768p
65−70
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 24% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
10−12
21−24
medium / 1080p
4−5
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 57% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
5−6
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
2−3
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
45−50
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
2−3
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
5−6
ultra / 1080p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
14−16
medium / 1080p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
80−85
90−95
ultra / 1080p
70−75
80−85
medium / 1080p
85−90
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 10% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
10−11
27−30
medium / 768p
8−9
18−20
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 23% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
NVS 810
Quadro K2000D
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Code name
GM107
GK107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
4 November 2015
1 March 2013
Pipelines
512
384
Core clock speed
902 MHz
954 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.06
30.53
Floating-point performance
2x 1,058 gflops
732.7 gflops
Length
198 mm
202 mm
Memory bus width
64 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
64 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
