Quadro K2000D vs Quadro K620M

In this comparison between Quadro K2000D and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000D will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Quadro K620M Check Price

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:

Quadro K620M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Quadro K620M
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000D has 70% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
Quadro K2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2000D and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro K2000D is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K2000D is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 75 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	3−4
ultra / 1080p	4−5	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	14−16
medium / 1080p	9−10	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	14−16	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	140−150	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	95−100
ultra / 1080p	55−60	45−50
QHD / 1440p	30−35	24−27
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
high / 768p	85−90	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	9−10	4−5
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	10−11	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−12	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 30% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	12−14	6−7
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	21−24
medium / 1080p	14−16	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 54% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	55−60	45−50
medium / 768p	50−55	−
high / 1080p	14−16	8−9
ultra / 1080p	7−8	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	5−6	2−3
ultra / 1080p	3−4	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	7−8
medium / 1080p	7−8	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	90−95	65−70
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro K620M.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	7−8
medium / 1080p	10−12	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	27−30	16−18
medium / 768p	18−20	12−14
high / 1080p	10−11	6−7
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Quadro K620M.
low / 768p	85−90	70−75
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	16−18
high / 768p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro K620M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Quadro K620M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK107	GM108
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 March 2013	1 March 2015
Pipelines	384	384
Core clock speed	954 MHz	1029 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53	17.98
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s	92 Mh/s
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000D vs Quadro K620M

Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares