Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R7 260X

When choosing between Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260X.

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	51 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Quadro K2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2000D is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2000D is 32 mm longer, than Radeon R7 260X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	7−8	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	27−30	50−55
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2000D and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	140−150	210−220
medium / 768p	110−120	180−190
ultra / 1080p	55−60	100−110
QHD / 1440p	30−35	55−60
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	85−90	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
medium / 768p	60−65	95−100
ultra / 1080p	35−40	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	9−10	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−11	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 73% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
medium / 768p	50−55	75−80
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	5−6	10−11
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	30−33
medium / 1080p	10−12	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	27−30	55−60
medium / 768p	18−20	35−40
high / 1080p	10−11	20−22
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro K2000D.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2000D	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Code name	GK107	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2013	8 October 2013
Pipelines	384	896
Core clock speed	954 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.53	61.60
Floating-point performance	732.7 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length	202 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2000D vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares