FirePro M4150 vs Quadro K2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro K2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2000M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 30 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
FirePro M4150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Quadro K2000M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Opal | N14P-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 23.84 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |