FirePro S7000 vs Quadro K2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7000 and Quadro K2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro K2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7000
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 536% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 205 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro S7000 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 750% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 243% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Pitcairn | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |