FirePro S7150 vs Quadro K2000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S7150 and Quadro K2000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro K2000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S7150
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 175 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro S7150 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S7150. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |