FirePro W4300 vs Quadro K2000M
When comparing FirePro W4300 and Quadro K2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4300 and Quadro K2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4300
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M has 10% more power consumption, than FirePro W4300.
FirePro W4300 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
FirePro W4300 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4300 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 185 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
1−2
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
4−5
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p
200−210
120−130
medium / 768p
170−180
90−95
ultra / 1080p
95−100
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
140−150
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
FirePro W4300 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
70−75
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
ultra / 1080p
60−65
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
2−3
ultra / 1080p
16−18
2−3
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
10−12
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
2−3
low / 720p
95−100
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
20−22
5−6
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
85−90
40−45
medium / 768p
75−80
−
high / 1080p
27−30
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
1−2
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
5−6
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
6−7
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
12−14
medium / 768p
30−35
8−9
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−12
3−4
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4300
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Kepler
Code name
Bonaire
N14P-Q3
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 December 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
930 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
2,080 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
44.64
23.84
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
572.2 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
152 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
