FirePro W5100 vs Quadro K2000M
In this comparison between FirePro W5100 and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M has 10% more power consumption, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 185 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- FirePro W5100 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W5100 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Bonaire | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 31 March 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |