Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W8000 vs Quadro K2000M

    When comparing FirePro W8000 and Quadro K2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W8000 and Quadro K2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro W8000 Check Price
    Quadro K2000M Check Price

    Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:

    Quadro K2000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W8000 Quadro K2000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 55 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro W8000 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
    • FirePro W8000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • FirePro W8000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
    • FirePro W8000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 155 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
    • FirePro W8000 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 3700 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 16−18 1−2
    ultra / 1080p 10−11 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 4−5 0−1
    low / 720p 35−40 12−14
    medium / 1080p 21−24 3−4
    The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro K2000M.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W8000 Quadro K2000M
    Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
    Code name Tahiti N14P-Q3
    Type Desktop Mobile workstation
    Release date 14 June 2012 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 1792 384
    Core clock speed 900 MHz 745 MHz
    Transistor count 4,313 million 1,270 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 100.8 23.84
    Floating-point performance 3,226 gflops 572.2 gflops
    Length 279 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5500 MHz 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 176 GB/s 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bus support PCIe 3.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 391 Mh/s 18 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Optimus +
    Form factor full height / full length
    StereoOutput3D +
    DisplayPort count 4
    Dual-link DVI support +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares