FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K2000M
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K2000M.
FireStream 9370
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Quadro K2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 80 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2800 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
FireStream 9370 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Quadro K2000M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Quadro K2000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | N14P-Q3 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 23.84 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |