GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro K2000M

When choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K2000M.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Quadro K2000M Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Quadro K2000M here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Quadro K2000M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M has 9% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 755 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	1−2
ultra / 1080p	−	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	12−14
medium / 1080p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	60−65	120−130
medium / 768p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	7−8	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
high / 768p	16−18	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
ultra / 1080p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	10−11	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	2−3
ultra / 1080p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	10−12
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	0−1	8−9
low / 768p	18−20	40−45
high / 1080p	0−1	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	1−2
ultra / 1080p	−	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	5−6
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
high / 1080p	27−30	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	8−9	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	6−7
low / 768p	0−1	12−14
medium / 768p	−	8−9
high / 1080p	−	4−5
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 768p	45−50	75−80
medium / 768p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	16−18
high / 768p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 96% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro K2000M
Architecture	G9x	Kepler
Code name	N10E-GS1	N14P-Q3
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 March 2009	1 June 2012
Pipelines	64	384
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	23.84
Floating-point performance	192 gflops	572.2 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		18 Mh/s
Laptop size	large	medium sized
Optimus		+
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro K2000M

GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares