GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 329% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 551 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 693 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200 | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |