GeForce GTX 650 vs Quadro K2000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
64 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 has 16% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTX 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 650 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K2000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 is 313 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 1795 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
1−2
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−11
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
GeForce GTX 650 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
120−130
medium / 768p
120−130
90−95
ultra / 1080p
60−65
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
18−20
high / 768p
90−95
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 650.
low / 768p
85−90
70−75
medium / 768p
65−70
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
2−3
ultra / 1080p
9−10
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
10−12
medium / 1080p
10−11
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
65−70
50−55
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
60−65
40−45
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
16−18
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
1−2
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
5−6
medium / 1080p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
high / 1080p
90−95
85−90
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
medium / 1080p
95−100
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
30−33
12−14
medium / 768p
20−22
8−9
high / 1080p
10−12
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 142% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK107
N14P-Q3
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
6 September 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
1058 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.9 billion/sec
23.84
Floating-point performance
812.5 gflops
572.2 gflops
Length
5.70" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128-bit GDDR5
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.0 GB/s
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80.0 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.38" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
26 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price