GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro K2000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 143% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 235 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 1794 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
1−2
ultra / 1080p
9−10
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
16−18
medium / 1080p
30−33
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
210−220
120−130
medium / 768p
180−190
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
40−45
QHD / 1440p
60−65
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−35
18−20
high / 768p
150−160
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
16−18
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
110−120
70−75
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
70−75
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
2−3
ultra / 1080p
18−20
2−3
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
10−12
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
12−14
2−3
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
60−65
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 187% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
5−6
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
low / 720p
55−60
16−18
medium / 1080p
30−35
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
40−45
medium / 768p
80−85
−
high / 1080p
30−35
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
1−2
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
5−6
medium / 1080p
14−16
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
6−7
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
60−65
12−14
medium / 768p
35−40
8−9
high / 1080p
21−24
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK106
N14P-Q3
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
1 June 2012
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
980 MHz
745 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
23.84
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
572.2 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
