GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro K2000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K2000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 660 Ti stacks up against Quadro K2000M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K2000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660 Ti is 170 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 1794 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
1−2
ultra / 1080p
12−14
0−1
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
27−30
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
−
ultra / 1080p
30−35
4−5
QHD / 1440p
14−16
0−1
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
70−75
16−18
medium / 1080p
40−45
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
120−130
medium / 768p
210−220
90−95
ultra / 1080p
120−130
40−45
QHD / 1440p
100−110
21−24
4K / 2160p
55−60
18−20
high / 768p
170−180
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
55−60
16−18
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
110−120
45−50
ultra / 1080p
85−90
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
2−3
ultra / 1080p
24−27
2−3
QHD / 1440p
20−22
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
55−60
10−12
medium / 1080p
30−33
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
10−11
ultra / 1080p
27−30
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
2−3
low / 720p
130−140
50−55
medium / 1080p
75−80
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Fortnite is 268% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
5−6
ultra / 1080p
27−30
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
16−18
medium / 1080p
40−45
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 411% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
110−120
40−45
medium / 768p
95−100
−
high / 1080p
45−50
5−6
ultra / 1080p
18−20
2−3
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
1−2
ultra / 1080p
10−12
0−1
QHD / 1440p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
5−6
medium / 1080p
20−22
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Minecraft is 30% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
75−80
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
40−45
6−7
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
80−85
12−14
medium / 768p
50−55
8−9
high / 1080p
27−30
4−5
ultra / 1080p
16−18
3−4
4K / 2160p
9−10
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 542% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
16−18
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 660 Ti in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
N14P-Q3
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
16 August 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
1344
384
Core clock speed
915 MHz
745 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
23.84
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
572.2 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192-bit GDDR5
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
99 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
