GRID K240Q vs Quadro K2000M
When choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000M.
GRID K240Q
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2000M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 57% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 94% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |