GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro K2000M
In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 288 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 78% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| GRID M10 8Q and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 271% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |