Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K2000M
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 or Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
1−2
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
90−95
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
QHD / 1440p
27−30
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
18−20
high / 768p
80−85
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
10−12
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
60−65
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−12
5−6
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
40−45
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
4−5
1−2
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
5−6
medium / 1080p
6−7
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
high / 1080p
90−95
85−90
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
medium / 1080p
90−95
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
6−7
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
24−27
12−14
medium / 768p
16−18
8−9
high / 1080p
9−10
4−5
ultra / 1080p
6−7
3−4
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
high / 768p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N14P-Q3
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
745 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
23.84
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
