Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro K2000M
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K2000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
1−2
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
80−85
90−95
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
high / 768p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
9−10
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
40−45
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
1−2
ultra / 1080p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
5−6
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
80−85
85−90
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
16−18
12−14
medium / 768p
12−14
8−9
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N14P-Q3
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
745 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
23.84
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
