Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K2000M
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K2000M.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 or Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
1−2
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
190−200
120−130
medium / 768p
160−170
90−95
ultra / 1080p
85−90
40−45
QHD / 1440p
45−50
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
120−130
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
85−90
45−50
ultra / 1080p
55−60
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
2−3
ultra / 1080p
14−16
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
10−12
medium / 1080p
16−18
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−11
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
2−3
low / 720p
85−90
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
5−6
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
40−45
medium / 768p
65−70
−
high / 1080p
24−27
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
1−2
ultra / 1080p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
5−6
medium / 1080p
10−12
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
95−100
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
6−7
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
12−14
medium / 768p
27−30
8−9
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
30−35
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
N14P-Q3
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2017
1 June 2012
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
745 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
23.84
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
