Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K2000M
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 or Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 395 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
1−2
ultra / 1080p
6−7
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
170−180
120−130
medium / 768p
140−150
90−95
ultra / 1080p
70−75
40−45
QHD / 1440p
40−45
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
27−30
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
75−80
45−50
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−12
2−3
ultra / 1080p
10−12
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
10−12
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
75−80
50−55
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
5−6
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
18−20
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
65−70
40−45
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
18−20
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
1−2
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
5−6
medium / 1080p
9−10
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
90−95
70−75
medium / 1080p
95−100
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
35−40
12−14
medium / 768p
21−24
8−9
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
high / 768p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Kepler
Code name
Skylake GT4e
N14P-Q3
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
72
384
Core clock speed
350 MHz
745 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
75.60
23.84
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
