Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro CX vs Quadro K2000M

    When comparing Quadro CX and Quadro K2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro CX and Quadro K2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro CX
    Quadro K2000M Check Price

    Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:

    Quadro K2000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro CX Quadro K2000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 55 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR3 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video No outputs
      Check Price
    • Quadro CX has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
    • Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
    • Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
    • Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 1−2 1−2
    ultra / 1080p 0−1 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 10−12 12−14
    medium / 1080p 2−3 3−4
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro CX.

    Full Specs

      Quadro CX Quadro K2000M
    Architecture Tesla 2.0 Kepler
    Code name GT200B N14P-Q3
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 11 November 2008 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 192 384
    Core clock speed 602 MHz 745 MHz
    Transistor count 1,400 million 1,270 million
    Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 38.53 23.84
    Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops 572.2 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 4.0 5.1
    OpenGL 3.3 4.6
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
    CUDA 1.3 +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 18 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Optimus +
      Check Price

    Similar compares