Quadro K1000M vs Quadro K2000M
In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M has 22% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 105 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2000M is 1800 MHz.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
1−2
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
high / 768p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
10−12
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
18−20
40−45
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
1−2
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
5−6
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
high / 1080p
27−30
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 69% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
6−7
low / 768p
0−1
12−14
medium / 768p
−
8−9
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
N14P-Q1
N14P-Q3
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
192
384
Core clock speed
850 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
23.84
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
572.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
