Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K2000M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    When comparing Quadro K2000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro K2000M Check Price
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    Quadro K2000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro K2000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    Quadro K2000M Laptops
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K2000M Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 40 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K2000M has 37% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    • Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro T2000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 185 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
    • Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 6200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 1−2 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 0−1 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 12−14 60−65
    medium / 1080p 3−4 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro K2000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K2000M Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name N14P-Q3 N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 June 2012 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 384 1024
    Core clock speed 745 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 1,270 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 23.84 103.7
    Floating-point performance 572.2 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
    CUDA + 7.5
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 18 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized medium sized
    Optimus +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares