Quadro K2000M vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Qualcomm Adreno 680 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Qualcomm Adreno 680 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2000M and Qualcomm Adreno 680 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K2000M and Qualcomm Adreno 680 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Qualcomm Adreno 680 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K2000M Qualcomm Adreno 680
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt
Interface MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - in Laptops.
  • Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Qualcomm Adreno 680 - by 7 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 1−2 0−1
ultra / 1080p 0−1
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 12−14 1−2
medium / 1080p 3−4 0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Qualcomm Adreno 680.

Full Specs

  Quadro K2000M Qualcomm Adreno 680
Architecture Kepler
Code name N14P-Q3
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Release date 1 June 2012 6 December 2018
Pipelines 384
Core clock speed 745 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 7 nm
Texture fill rate 23.84
Floating-point performance 572.2 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s
Shared memory - +
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 18 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized
Optimus +
  Check Price Check Price