Quadro K2000M vs Radeon 520
In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Radeon 520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon 520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon 520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K2000M and Radeon 520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon 520
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M has 10% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon 520 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 285 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon 520 is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
0−1
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
1−2
medium / 1080p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon 520.
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
120−130
55−60
medium / 768p
90−95
30−33
ultra / 1080p
40−45
6−7
QHD / 1440p
21−24
−
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
high / 768p
65−70
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p
70−75
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
2−3
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
10−12
0−1
medium / 1080p
3−4
−
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
−
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
5−6
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
low / 768p
40−45
18−20
high / 1080p
5−6
0−1
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
1−2
−
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
5−6
0−1
medium / 1080p
3−4
−
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
high / 1080p
85−90
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon 520.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
27−30
10−11
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than Radeon 520.
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
6−7
0−1
low / 768p
12−14
0−1
medium / 768p
8−9
−
high / 1080p
4−5
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Radeon 520.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon 520
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Code name
N14P-Q3
Oland
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 June 2012
21 March 2017
Pipelines
384
320
Core clock speed
745 MHz
1030 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
20.60
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
659.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
16 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.0
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
