Quadro K2000M vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2000M stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000M has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 155 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
90−95
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
21−24
65−70
4K / 2160p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
30−33
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 311% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
5−6
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
60−65
medium / 768p
8−9
40−45
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14P-Q3
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
8 August 2016
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
745 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
58.05
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
