Quadro K2000M vs Radeon Pro 460

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K2000M stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.

Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Radeon Pro 460 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K2000M Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt
Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro K2000M has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
  • Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
  • Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
  • Both cards are used in Laptops.
  • Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
  • Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 155 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
  • Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 1−2 16−18
ultra / 1080p 0−1 10−11
QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
low / 720p 12−14 35−40
medium / 1080p 3−4 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro K2000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro K2000M Radeon Pro 460
Architecture Kepler Polaris
Code name N14P-Q3 Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
Release date 1 June 2012 8 August 2016
Pipelines 384 1024
Core clock speed 745 MHz 900 MHz
Boost Clock 907 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million 3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 23.84 58.05
Floating-point performance 572.2 gflops 1,858 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s 81.28 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (12_0)
Shader Model 5.1 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.131
CUDA +
FreeSync +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 18 Mh/s 227 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized large
Optimus +
  Check Price Check Price