Quadro K2000M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When comparing Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro W5500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro W5500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro W5500M
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 54% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 10200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
Quadro K2000M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro K2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | N14P-Q3 | Navi 14 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |