Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 360

In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 360 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 360 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K2000M Radeon R7 360
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 100 Watt
Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon R7 360 has 81% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
  • Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 360 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 360 - in Desktops.
  • Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 360 - with GCN 2.0.
  • Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 360 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 1−2 16−18
ultra / 1080p 0−1 9−10
QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
4K / 2160p 4−5
low / 720p 12−14 30−35
medium / 1080p 3−4 20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Quadro K2000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro K2000M Radeon R7 360
Architecture Kepler GCN 2.0
Code name N14P-Q3 Tobago
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Release date 1 June 2012 18 June 2015
Pipelines 384 768
Core clock speed 745 MHz
Boost Clock 1000 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million 2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 23.84 50.40
Floating-point performance 572.2 gflops 1,613 gflops
Length 165 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s 112 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.126 +
CUDA +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.2 kh/s
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 18 Mh/s 225 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized
Optimus +
Eyefinity +
PowerTune +
TrueAudio +
Mantle +
Design reference
Bridgeless CrossFire +
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
VCE +
DDMA audio +
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.29 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 10 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 102 Sol/s
  Check Price Check Price