Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
When comparing Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 57% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | N14P-Q3 | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 720 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 | |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro K2000M vs GeForce GTX 280
- Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 280
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Quadro K2000M vs Radeon HD 4890
- Quadro K2000M vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX