Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 M350
In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M350
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 800 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | Opal |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |