Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 M465X
When choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M465X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M465X.
Radeon R7 M465X
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 M465X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M465X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 155 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R7 M465X is 2700 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 36% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |