Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R9 370
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 370. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 370. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 370
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 180 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 3800 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | Trinidad |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |