Quadro K2000M vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Radeon RX 560 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 560 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon RX 560 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K2000M and Radeon RX 560 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Radeon RX 560 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon RX 560 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 55 Watt.
Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX 560 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Radeon RX 560 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - in Laptops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 430 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
18−20
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
90−95
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
110−120
QHD / 1440p
21−24
70−75
4K / 2160p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 322% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
5−6
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
65−70
medium / 768p
8−9
40−45
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon RX 560 mobile
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14P-Q3
Polaris 11
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 June 2012
5 January 2017
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
745 MHz
1175 MHz
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
58.97
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
2,462 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price