Quadro K2000M vs Tesla M10
When comparing Quadro K2000M and Tesla M10, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2000M and Tesla M10 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M10
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 288 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 311% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2000M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | N14P-Q3 | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |